OPPOSITION TO CHRIST
IV. QUARTER.,
LESSON VIII., NOV. 25, MARK 3:22-35.
golden Text-“He came unto his own, and his own received him not.”-John 1:11,
As the fame of Jesus
increased, because of his miracles and teaching (Luke 4:14, 15, 33-37; 5:12-15,
19, 25; 26; 7:16, 17; 8:1-4; Matt. 4:23, 24; 9:18, 26, 35; Mark 1:27, 28;
3:20), the opposition to him became more and more pronounced, especially from the
Chief Priests, Scribes and Pharisees, as they were brought into competition and
unfavorable comparison with him as public teachers; and the indications were
that all the people would be drawn after him, and that they would soon be left
out of their official positions and the accompanying honors and emoluments. For
such a change they were not in heart-readiness, although the prophet had
foretold that “unto him [the Messiah] shall the gathering of the people be.”
(Gen. 40:10) They did not have the humble, unselfish spirit of John the
Baptist, who meekly said. “There standeth one among you, whom ye know not; he
it is who, coming after me, is preferred before me, whose shoe’s latchet I am,
not worthy to unloose: . . . he must increase, but I must decrease.”-John 1:26,
27; 3:30.
Instead of manifesting, such a spirit, they allowed pride, envy and malice to
fill their hearts and actuate their conduct, and sought by every means in their
power to obstruct and counteract the Lord’s teaching. In this way they shut the
door of the kingdom of heaven against themselves and against all those into
whom they infused the same evil spirit. (Matt 23:13) They wickedly blinded
their own eyes, and then, with their deluded followers-the masses of the whole
Jewish nation-they stumbled into the ditch of divine disfavor, where as a
nation they must remain until the fullness of the Gentiles-the elect number
constitute the bride of Christ-has come into possession of the kingdom and
eternal glory, which they proved themselves unworthy of and therefore failed to
receive, although it was offered to them first.
In the instance of this lesson, it seems probable that these caviling Scribes
were commissioned by the Jewish ecclesiastics at Jerusalem (verse 22) to come
as spies to watch his words, withstand his teachings and if possible, find some
occasion against him.
While the multitudes marveled at the miracle which cast a devil out of a dumb
man, enabling him to speak and to be clothed in his right mind, saying, “It was
never so seen in Israel” (Matt. 9:32-34), these Scribes and Pharisees
circulated the idea among the people that Jesus was possessed of a devil, and
that he cast out devils through the power of the prince of devils.
When this report came to the Lord’s notice, he called the objectors to him and
made manifest the absurdity of such teaching. saying in substance, with
reference not only to the miracle just performed, but to his entire work as
known and opposed by the Scribes and Pharisees, “How can Satan cast out Satan?”
etc. That would be suicidal. It would be equivalent to a king stirring up
strife in his own kingdom and working against his own cause; or the head of a
house alienating and disrupting his own family and opposing the operation of
his own plans. It is not presumable that Satan would thus seek to thwart his
own purpose and oppose his own plans, unless he had reached great straits and
found his kingdom already falling from his grasp.-Verses 23-26.
Again our Lord reasoned with them (verse 27), that “no man can enter into a strong
man’s house and spoil his goods, except he first bind the strong man; and then
he will spoil his house.” The “Strong man” here referred to is Satan, who is
the powerful “prince of this world”-his dominion or house. He will surely hold
his dominion and pursue his own policy as long as possible, and will diligently
resist every binding influence which threatens the loss of his power. The work
and teaching of Jesus were just such binding influences; and the opposition
which his words met was what might be expected as a manifestation of Satan’s
wrath. During the Gospel age generally the prince of darkness has flourished,
and consequently a large portion of it is known as the “dark ages.” But since
the beginning of the time of the end, in 1799, God has specially let in the
light,-and particularly since 1878. The more the “light” shines, the more
active is this adversary to preserve his power; but God’s assurance is that
Christ, as the Strong Messenger, will now quickly bind Satan’s power and
release humanity from his dominion. (Rev. 20:1, 2) Then Christ, already the
Redeemer, will be the Savior or Deliverer of all who come unto God by him. That
will be salvation to the uttermost. What we now enjoy is salvation by faith and
hope. (Rom. 8:24, 25).
That Satan’s house is now dividing against itself is manifest in that we see
those who with deep and cunning sophistries oppose the truth, teaching the
doctrines of Satan, at the same time doing the good works of healing, etc.
Thus, for instance, Christian Science (falsely so-called, for there is nothing
either Christian or scientific in it) denies both the redemption by Christ
Jesus and also the very existence of God, and yet its advocates undoubtedly
perform marvels of healing. Can any one claim such healings to be of God? Not
unless God’s kingdom is divided against itself. Which horn of the dilemma shall
we accept? Is it likely that God would thus endorse the doctrines of Satan? Is
it not more probable that Satan would exert his power to imitate the works of
God, thereby to support his doctrines and to deceive? Such must be our
conclusions in view of the warnings given us to the effect that thus it should
be in the last times.
Before Satan will submit to the binding influences of the rightful Prince of
this world, who now comes to take the dominion to himself, we should, as we are
forewarned, expect Satan to transform himself into a minister of “light” (2
Cor. 11:14, 15), that he may preach false gospels and perform “many wonderful
works,” healing, etc., insomuch as to “deceive, if it were possible, the very
elect.” Such manifestations (and we now see them multiplying all around us-in
Christian Science, Spiritism, Theosophy and other delusions of which we were
forewarned (Matt. 24:24; 2 Thes. 2:11), are evidences that Satan’s kingdom is
being hard pressed by the truth and is nearing its end.
Our Lord’s reasoning, although clear and logical, did not change the attitude
of those malicious, willful opposers, who manifested a large measure of Satan’s
spirit. The Lord saw this, and hence the rebuke and solemn warning which
followed.-See verses 28-30.
The sin which cannot be forgiven, and which, therefore, must be expiated or
punished before the sinner’s repentance can be accepted, is that of blasphemy
against the holy Spirit, or willful opposition against that which is known to
be holy and of divine appointment. The spirit which instigates such conduct is
that of treason against God, and those who manifest it in any degree are in
danger of eternal condemnation-eternal death; for, according to Heb.
10:26-31; 6:4-8, willful opposition, in the face of clear, full knowledge of
the divine will, incurs that penalty. Consequently, every approach to such a
treasonable spirit is dangerous. And a manifestation of any measure of
that spirit is a sin which must be punished with stripes. (Luke 12:47, 48)
Every sin against light increases the danger of going into the second or
eternal death.-1 John 5:16, 17.
The punishment meted out to such is, however, no part of the satisfaction to
divine justice whereby deliverance from Adamic death is secured: that was done
by Christ, whose sacrifice was the all-sufficient ransom which reconciles the
repentant sinner to God. The “stripes” for every measure of willful sin against
the light which emanates from the spirit of God are a necessary part of the corrective
discipline of Christ in bringing the reckonedly justified but erring ones
back to full harmony with God. But if the corrective discipline does not
produce reform, the increase of knowledge and experience will shortly make it a
willful sin against full knowledge, for which the full penalty would be
inflicted-second death. Verses 20, 21, 31 (See Emphatic Diaglott), seem
to indicate more of a spirit of fear and anxiety on the part of the Lord’s
mother and brethren, than of opposition. His brethren did not believe in his
claims and doctrines at that time, and seemingly could not understand why he
was so revolutionary in his teachings and so antagonistic to all the recognized
religious teachers of his day, etc., etc., (John 7:5), while his mother
doubtless still pondered the mystery in her mind. Yet hearing of the attention
he was attracting, and the increased murmurings of opposition and violence
against him, they came from Nazareth to see and talk with him, and doubtless to
urge him to greater caution for his safety and to more care for his physical
necessities of rest and refreshment.
The occasion of their call upon him was an opportunity for the expression of
his strong and tender affection for all that do the will of God. The heavenly
relationship was the one dearest to him.
In the
opposition which our Lord incurred and the manner in which he met it, there are
valuable lessons for all who are similarly tried. Opposition and persecution
are the inevitable concomitants of activity in the service of God, and they
should be met with reason and candor; and when these fail of their purpose,
then, with solemn warnings of the dangers of such a course, the willful opposer
should be left to pursue his own course while we turn to others with the
message of salvation.